Wednesday, December 7, 2011

China's New Economic Threat

With this week topic on the threat the Chinese economy poses to the U.S economy, I would like to bring up what is consider one of the biggest economic threat China poses to the U.S. This would be China’s vast control over critical rare earth resources in the world. China has quietly over the years accumulated control over the world’s rare earth metal supplies and is still making an even bigger push to consolidate even more of Earth supply. These rare metals include scandium, lanthanum, cerium, europium, etc. These elements are used in many high tech components and products. This is especially true of electronic products where they are essential in producing televisions, smart phones, satellites, and ballistic missiles. While they only have 30% of the world supply of rare earth minerals, they have wheel and deal their way to control 97% of the world’s rare earth mineral supply. This is mainly due to China development practices and investment in Africa that has it enabled it to control a monopoly over these resources. China has become Africa’s largest trading partner and bilateral trade rose to $115 billion in 2010. This is due to China’s no strings attached policy when it comes to development aid and massive amounts of aid that has been invested into Africa to develop stronger ties with many African countries. For example China has agreed to build 1,800 miles of railways, 2,000 miles of roads, two new universities, etc. This is in exchange for 11 million tons of copper and 620,000 tons of cobalt over the next 25 years. In the past couple of years China has further tighten the supply of rare earth minerals by implementing rare earth export quotas and by raising export taxes for rare earth exports by 1000%. This has artificially inflated the prices of these goods and with growing demand for electronics could cause the price of electronics goods to rapidly rise.

If the U.S does not take measures to counteract these aggressive business moves by China, the U.S economy in the future will be at the mercy of China. If China continues to tighten its exports it will cause severe shortages for the U.S high-tech economy, which the U.S economy is built around. China has already demonstrated that it is willing to cut its export quota in order to raise prices or to put pressure on other countries. China’s export quota for 2010 was 32,000 tons of minerals and with demand rising to 55,000 it has cut that quota to 25,000. In 2010, China and Japan had a dispute involving a Chinese fishing boat and Japanese Coast Guard vessels over disputed territory. It quickly escalated into a full blown diplomatic fight between the two countries and greatly strained the relationship between the two countries. China in response to this dispute temporarily suspended rare earth mineral exports to Japan to show that they were not to be messed with. This incident clearly shows how China can manipulate the fact that they control the majority of these vital strategic resources, and are not afraid to do so. An incident like this could occur in the future to the U.S if China still controls the majority of these crucial resources that could cripple the U.S. The U.S- China relationship is already severely strain over topics such as independence for Tibet and Taiwan, human rights and environmental standards. The U.S dependence on these resources makes it more complicated and difficult for the U.S to stand up to China in responses to these topics.

The U.S needs to start the process boosting its domestic production of these resources; so that the U.S will have a steady supply for the future. The U.S has a sizeable supply of these resources but the only problem is that it would be expensive and potentially environmentally harmful. While there are potentially consequences for the increase in domestic production, the consequences for not doing so are much greater. In a recent congressional report the DOD was asked if a shortage of these resources is a threat to national security. The DOD respond that yes it would be a national security threat as many of their high tech weapon systems (such as ballistic missiles and drones) depend on these resources in order to function and there are very few alternatives to replace them with. The U.S in the next couple of years must begin to plan to expand mining operations of rare earth elements in the U.S. While they do not necessarily starting mining in the next couple of years, planning and studies of the effects of such mining operations must begin. This way in the future if a crisis occurs or prices for these resources begins to skyrocket, there are shovel ready projects to begin the process of mining.

Molycorps (a company that is one of the largest suppliers of rare earth elements in the U.S) states that one of the reasons why China dominates the industry is because they have more than 6,000 rare-earth technologists compared with only a handful in the U.S. This highlights that the U.S has begun to lose some of its technological prowess in the world because it is falling behind in producing scientists, engineers, and other jobs in the STEM field. For this reason the U.S must put more emphasis in schools and colleges in the fields of science and math, in order to produce more scientific specialists to help the U.S keep its edge. Specifically more funding should be spent on scholarship and training for rare-earth technologists, so that the U.S can continue to compete with China in this section. This way there are more experts available to help plan and organize the mining of rare earth resources in the U.S. They could also be tasked to develop less environmental damaging ways to mine these resources in the U.S.

I would also advise the creation of a U.S rare earth strategic reserve. This reserve would be used in times of emergency in case normal supplies were severely disrupted or even cut off entirely. These supplies would be used to maintain critical advance weapons systems in the U.S that depend on these rare earth elements to function. This would also make it more difficult for China to twist the U.S arm and threaten to cut the U.S off, like they did to Japan. As the U.S would be more prepared to deal with the consequences of this and would be able to effectively deal with the shortage for a certain period of time. This reserve would be similar to the strategic reserve for oil, as it would be the U.S the able to deal with a shortage/emergency for a small period of time. In the same way that U.S reliance on foreign oil is a threat to U.S national security so is the U.S dependence on these foreign elements.

This topic relates to this week simulation of an economic trade negotiation between China and the U.S. While the U.S and China are extremely economically dependent on each other, there are multiple economic issues that threaten the U.S- China relationship. This is one of the economic issues that in the coming years will be a major point of discussion between the two countries. It also relates to the idea of realism because the U.S fears that if China dominates the rare earth element market that it will affect there national security. As they cannot fully trust that China will always trade with them, but must account for the fact that China may cut off their supply. China by having this economic superiority translates to them to having a growing sense of world power. The U.S is wary of China growing global power, and many U.S officials that the next cold war will be between the U.S and China.

The next step in researching the topic of China’s dominance of rare earth elements is to see possible response that the U.S could pose in retaliation. Or would the U.S be able to retaliate at all, due to their economic dependence on China? Also another quandary to ponder is could international organization such as the WTO (World trade organization) get involve to prevent such a trade war from occurring?

Works Citied

Barrett, Raymond. "U.S Rare Earths Miners Would Benefit from Proposed Stockpile." Financial Times. The Financial Times LTD, 4 Nov. 2011. Web. 6 Dec. 2011. .

Powe, Alicia. "U.S. at China's Mercy for Rare Earth Minerals - HUMAN EVENTS." Human Events. Eage Publishing, INC, 13 Nov. 2011. Web. 07 Dec. 2011. .

White, Garry. "Commodites: Chinese Exports of Rare Earth Minerals Fall - Telegraph." The Telegraph. Telegraph Media Group, 04 Dec. 2011. Web. 07 Dec. 2011. .

11 comments:

  1. Tony, this was a very interesting blog post and very relevant to the worldwide economy today. The rise of the GDP and market in the 90s was contributed to by the success of the new technology era ushered in by the mass marketing of computers and the internet. Although the U.S. has been "officially" out of a recession the numbers are still grim and show no sign of a fast recovery. Although you mention how the U.S. needs to invest in material resources I think it also needs to invest in technological innovation that first sparked a whole new amount of jobs, outputs, and capital.

    This is obviously much easier said than done, however, as you point out, this is impossible unless the U.S. can easily get its hands available on the necessary resources. Since it affects the economy as a whole it also affects the spending and resources that we have available for investment opportunities, military spending, and other possible ways for the U.S. to enhance its power in relation to the rest of the world. Your plan of setting up an emergency rare earth strategic reserve I think is one of necessity just in case China does one day try to withhold the 97% of metals in its supply. Do you ever think that China would really ever attempt that though? The Chinese and U.S. are extremely dependent on each other and both need each other for their respective economies to survive.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Tony! I really enjoyed this post. It's a very real issue and I agree that the US will need to address it in the near future. While I believe that the US education system needs reform for various reasons, investment in STEM programs is a primary requirement of any education reform. I very much agree with you about the rare-earth mineral reserve. If the US had a reserve for such rare minerals, any decrease in availability would take longer to harm US operations, even for only enough time to address the situation.

    However, I don't quite know if China-US relations will ever be dependent on the availability of rare-earth minerals. The growth of the Chinese economy has really been based on a massive export economy. If China were to keep materials from the US in an attempt to control the actions of the US, the US would have many other means in which to reply to China, most of which would significantly harm China, in terms of image, economy, or even militarily. China would have an excessively difficult time of controlling a country that it is so dependent on for investment and purchasing. What do you think?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ryan,

    While it would be a last resort measure, if China was pushed and agitated far enough they could potentially do this. While their economy is heavily intertwined with the U.S economy, I believe the the U.S economy is more reliant on China then China is on the U.S. Also their economy would be better able to weather such a shock due to the fact that the government has more control of the economy and due to the fact that they are the stronger economy currently( based off of GDP growth)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Josh,

    Yes while the U.S could retaliate in various forms, it would only lead to China retaliating back. Militarily I believe there is no real option as it would be extremely risky and would most likely lead to a war. The most likely response would be economic in my option, however then China could play the fact that they own such a large percentage of the U.S debt.

    As i stated above I believe that China economy would be able to better handle the shock than the U.S economy.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hey Tony,
    Certainly the US is a huge importer of these earth metals, and I believe this is one of the big industries the US has to offer. So I agree that we need to be investing in math, science, and engineering to keep us ahead.
    Is China doing this with any other natural resources. I cannot even imagine a world where the US can't produce technology, so what other natural resources could China withhold?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Emma,
    To my knowledge there is no other natural resources that China could withhold that would have an significant impact of the U.S economy. However they could withhold machine produce equipment that would have an impact in the U.S. Which would be items like electrical machinery/equipment and medical supplies.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Tony,
    It seems interesting that China and the US would be in a race for natural resources, when the world is trying to move toward a more sustainable existence.
    In reality, I think in the next 50 years or so, the real competition between these two states is who can create and utilize the most sustainable resources for their countries as well as exporting these resources to other countries.
    Green energy and sustainable resources are going to be the future of much of economic competition. I think the race for coal has ended, but the race for alternative energy sources has begun.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Tony,

    Some economists are beginning to see a trend wherein the rapid Chinese growth of the last two decades is starting to slow. The Chinese government has been forced into increasingly drastic measures with their monetary system in order to keep exports high.

    The question is, if chinese growth does slow, how can the US take advantage of this to reassert its economic dominance?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hannah,

    I believe that both a race for natural resources and alternative energy sources has begun between China and U.S. As a country still needs natural resources to bridge the transition to alternative resources. I do remember reading that China has begun to beat out the U.S in terms of producing solar panels.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Wyatt,

    The quandary I see with your question is that the U.S economy is already in a slump and growing at a sluggish pace. However, the U.S can begin to reassert its economic dominance by improving production of green technology. As Hannah stated above there is a race between China and the U.S on green technology. The U.S needs to continue to invest in green technology that will give it the edge in the race.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Tony,

    Great point. China is one the cutting edge of green technology, and the US has a little bit of catch up to do.

    ReplyDelete