Sunday, September 25, 2011

Realism in the Basque Region of Spain

Realism in the Basque Region of Spain

What made war inevitable was the want for power, the need for individualism, the want of isolation and the closed-mindedness of opposing states. All of these factors have had a role in the attempted separation of the “Basque Country” or “El Pais Vasco” from Spain. From before the Spanish Civil War in 1936 until today the Basque’s have always been trying to find a way to separate and become an independent state. Their reasoning behind this want for separation can be described through a realist point of view.

The Basque region has a very interesting and unique history. For a very long time, the area was divided between Spain and France; this division has caused many nationalists problems. The Basque region is a very nationalist area and nationalism has had an extreme importance in the region. This is one of the reasons why the Basque region is so unique. Another reason would be despite the fact that it is a part of Spain; the Basque region doesn’t necessarily speak traditional Spanish; they speak a “dialect” of Spanish that in reality has very little relation to actual Spanish at all. As Spanish is considered a “romantic language” many do not consider Vasco anything close to this. The Basque region has taken much pride in its differences from the rest of Spain and this pride leads to their individualism.

As Spain’s government and monarchy went through many changes many people immigrated out of traditional regions and into area such as the Basque. The nationals of the Basque region considered this abundance of immigrants as an invasion of their territory that demolished their identity. This lead to the nationalist defense of the region; the Basque region has always been known as very defensive and independent. Outsiders were not welcomed in the Basque region; they truly wanted to be isolated and left to their own ideas.

The Basque region followed an idea known as “carlismo”. Carlismo was a tradionalist and legitimist political movement that questioned who could be in charge of the Spanish throne. The Partido (Party) Nationalist Vasco (PNV) came about from this movement during the rule of Francisco Franco. In 1959 the ETA (today a very violent party in Spain) was formed by a young group of nationalists that weren’t satisfied by the previous national party known as PNV. The group ETA believed in the importance of their language, their religion (strong Catholics) and social justice. They were anti-capitalist and were also anti-imperialist. They did not really gain a reputation of violence until 1961. It has been said that the terrorism of ETA is without a doubt, the principal obstacle Spain faces in trying to have unity and protection as explained in the Constitution of 1978. The ETA is a part of very violent nationalism; their party on a political scale is very far left and is even considered Marxist.

Today the ETA in the Basque region is still pushing for independence but has been rather calm. Since 1959 the ETA has killed over 820 people in acts such as car bombs and shootings. “But the group has been decimated in recent years by arrests of its leaders and members, and has not killed anyone in Spain in more than two years” (NPR). There are over 700 ETA prisoners in jail between Spain and France; many believe this is the reason why acts of violence have been so low. In fact, the ETA has even been in a ceasefire since September of 2010. Despite the fact that no violence is coming from the group, they still hold protests frequently and still are trying to get their independence.

Perhaps realism can explain why the Basque region’s want for independence is strong? As we saw in class and through our lab, realism can help explain why people go to war. When looking back at what made “war” inevitable in the Basque regions we saw that the want for power played a huge role. As we know, the idea of realism supports the concept that there will always be a want for power. Realism shows us that there is a reason behind everything; and that motives lead to these reasons. Some motives that explain the actions of the Basque region and the ETA include their individualism and their want to be a separate state. We saw in realism that security also played a large role. When the Basque region had multiple groups of immigrants invading their territory they felt threatened and needed to increase their own security. The Basque region simply did not trust the other regions of Spain or the other ruling powers of Spain. Why was the ETA so violent? Violence was a motive to them; violence was a way to gain their independence. To this day, these concepts that support the idea of Realism can still explain what is going on between the Basque region and the rest of Spain; it explains why they so desperately want independence.

Realism cannot explain though what will happen in the future in the Basque region. Will the ETA stray away from its ceasefire and come back into a world of violence? Many believe that in the upcoming November elections in Spain the ETA will strike again. Realism cannot explain whether or not the Basque region will ever gain its independence; only time will tell.

Works Cited

Book, The. "Jailed Members Of Basque ETA Renounce Violence: NPR." NPR: National Public Radio: News & Analysis, World, US, Music & Arts: NPR. Web. 25 Sept. 2011. .

Pereira-Muro, Carmen, and John Beusterien. "Capitulo 9." Culturas De Espan%u0303a. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2003. Print.

4 comments:

  1. Some cultures can be reluctant to change in any form, wanting to preserve there own way of life. In doing so, they in some cases go as far as committing acts of violence and disregarding laws/regulations.

    This is the case with the ETA in the Basque region of Spain. I agree with Rachel; the region of Basque and its call for independence is an example modern realism. This is a major power struggle between Madrid (the capital of Spain) and Basque nationalism.

    Going off of points stated in class, the people who support the ETA's actions seem like they are advocating the call of self-preservation; they are showing off their power through violent resistance, wanting to ensure security of what the Basque region stands for. The ETA is acting out of self interest, disregarding things like ceasefires.

    Until the the violent measures stop (those of which include killings), I think that there will be no genuine talks regarding the independence of the Basque region. Self-determination will not be considered by the national government in Madrid unless there is tranquility to discuss the question of independence under. This will be the starting point to talks about actual independence of the Basque region.

    http://www.euronews.net/tag/basque-country/

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/04/opinion/04iht-edwoodworth.html

    http://articles.cnn.com/2011-02-09/world/spain.basque.politics_1_batasuna-party-basque-region-basque-independence?_s=PM:WORLD

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rach, while I agree with your point, and your claim that the region of Basque and its efforts in self preservation is an example of modern realism, I don't necessarily agree with your statement that "the idea of realism supports the concept that there will always be a want for power."

    If you look at the role Spain plays in this situation, I think it is safer to assume that realism supports the concept of self-interest more then power. Although power can be a form of self interest, realist based decisions are not always made with 'power' as the ultimate goal. If Spain wanted to assert its power over the island, it could easily do so. However, I don't believe it is in the nations interest to waste their time and resources on demonstrating their power on merely an island.

    So yes, I agree with you that the Basque region of Spain is clearly attempting to demonstrate their power, however this is being done as an act of self interest and preservation, not purely power itself.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for those article Courtney!
    Julia I agree with what you are saying. "Power" isn't always the ultimate goal. Using the term self-interest is a much better way to explain what is going on in the Basque region.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Now that we’ve learned about Liberalism, I would like to draw this theory into the picture as well. Surprisingly, by using Liberalism to explain the relationship between the Basque region and the Spanish state, it seems that conflict is inevitable.
    Liberalism makes clear that two states with differing institutions have a higher likelihood of going to war. Spain, with its Parliamentary Monarchy, is embedded in democratic ideology. In contrast, the Basque region is much more autocratic—they want independence, and the ETA dominates this movement through violence. According to liberal theory, because of these differing institutions, it will be difficult to maintain a peaceful dynamic.
    Bringing back realism, Spain will either have to take a more passive stance toward the Basque call for independence, and increase their security only if necessary, or with a liberal frame of mind, Spain will go to war with the ETA because of their differing institutions.

    ReplyDelete