Saturday, October 1, 2011

The European Union: A Liberal Reaction to the Global Financial Crisis

The European Union is arguably one of the most liberal institutions we have on the planet right now. Proponents of Liberalism hold the EU in great esteem as the example to follow for the rest of the world. But, the global financial downturn of 2008 has caused some countries in the EU, namely Greece and Ireland, to be on the verge of default. For a time, there was controversy over what the rest of the EU should do, namely Germany, who is their strongest economy. This past week, they made their decision. Germany, along with twelve other confirmed EU members, will help bailout Greece. A realist would ask, “why”? While a liberal would ask, “why not”? The Greek bailout and the European Union as a whole are prime examples of liberalism at work.

First, we need to look a little bit at the history behind this crisis. The global financial crisis of 2008 took most of the world by surprise. The American housing bubble collapsed, large banking institutions failed, and unemployment skyrocketed. By 2010, many countries were still in trouble. For the Europeans, it was no different. In an effort to guarantee the future financial security of the Eurozone, the European Union created the European Financial Stability Facility (efsf.europa.eu). Its goal is to “raise funds in capital markets to finance loans for euro area member states” (efsf.europa.eu). Unfortunately, Greece is too deep in debt to sufficiently be rescued by the resources that the EFSF had. It became clear that Greece was going to default unless some drastic action was taken, and member states scrambled to come up with a plan. Some argued that it would be best for Greece to default, Michael Gerson notes that many Germans are reluctant to bail out their fellow EU members unless “there is some consequence for irresponsibility” (1). Nicholas Kulish reports that despite some resistance, Chancellor Angela Merkel was able to pull together enough votes in the German parliament to expand the powers of the EFSF (A4+A9). Germany joins twelve other members of the EFSF in granting this expansion, but Greece will have to wait for four more countries to vote before it sees any aid (Kulish A9). For now, their fate hangs in the balance, but it is likely that they will get the help that they need.

This raises the question of the realist. Why would any sovereign state agree to spend their hard earned money to bail out some other country that was not as financially responsible as yours, especially if you are also in trouble also? In short, it is because of the liberal attitude of the nations in the European Union. Liberal Intuitionalism plays a huge role in this matter, not to mention in the EU as a whole. The EFSF is a perfect example of an international institution. 17 nations are members of it, all of which contribute to its funding. It provides a safe place for the nations to send their money, and a forum for them to voice their concerns. Their attitude about the Greek debt crisis also has liberal reasoning behind it. When speaking about the possible Greek default, Chancellor Merkel said, “I have made my position very clear that everything must be done to keep the eurozone together politically. Because we would soon have a domino effect"(BBC 1). This remark shows that the countries of the EU depend on each other for a lot of things. Due to the very high trade amount, another example of liberalism, if one country goes down, then others are sure to follow. Thus it makes sense for them to take a liberal approach to this situation. Unfortunately, it also requires Germany to take a leading role in the EU. Due to its complicated history- namely being on the losing end of two world wars in fifty years- some Germans, and other Europeans, are uncomfortable with this (Mayer 1). Regardless of whether they are a reluctant leader, or an enthusiastic one, Germany needs to take on this role if the EU is going to look the same at the end of this troubled time.

In all likelihood, the European Union will pull through. Greece will get its stimulus package, and will hopefully fix its financial mess. But a quite a few questions remain. For example, what will the Eurozone do if this happens again? Since this stimulus is not a long-term fix, what will happen with the Greek economy in the future? Not to mention, is this setting a precedent for nations in the European Union to just be bailed out whenever they need it? Only time will tell. In the meantime, the European leaders will kick the can down the road again, and we will not see a solution to this question until more substantial reforms are made to the financial core of the eurozone.





“About EFSF”. efsf.europa.eu. European Financial Stability Facility. n.d. Web. 30 September 2011. http://www.efsf.europa.eu/about/index.htm

British Broadcasting Company. “Angela Merkel tries to allay Greece default fears.” BBC News. 1 October 2011. Web. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-14894774

Gerson, Michael. “Greek Default Could Reveal Flaw in EU Structure.” San Francisco Chronicle. 30 September 2011. Web. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/09/29/EDF91LBC2A.DTL

Kulish, Nicholas. “Germany Approves Bailout Expansion, Leaving Slovakia as Main Hurdle.” The New York Times 30 September 2011: A4+A9. Print.

Mayer, Katherine. “Germany: Grappling with the Euro, and with Its Own Complicated History.” Time Magazine. 27 September 2011. Web. http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2095157,00.html

2 comments:

  1. Hey JR, I thought you brought up some really good points about the EU in your blog, here are some more questions to consider...

    Do you think this economic depression will hurt or strengthen the European Union? Do you think Germany will want to help bail out Ireland to avoid another default in the EU? You talked about how “Due to the very high trade amount, another example of liberalism, if one country goes down, then others are sure to follow.” Do you think this is a good thing? Wouldn’t it be bad for the countries of the EU, especially the more powerful ones like France and Germany, if their economies are ruined because they are bailing out other countries? Is the EU truly beneficial then?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Emma, I think that the EU will definitely be hurting for awhile, just like the rest of the world. However, I think that in the long run they will get through it, they might not look the same on the other side, but I believe they will make it.

    As for Germany's response to future bailouts, I believe they will be on board with doing whatever it takes to keep the EU together. Remember what I said about Germany's past, they want to be strong, but the rest of Europe is still a little wary of a powerful Germany. The Germans realize this, so they know that the only way they will be able to be a leader on the world stage is within the "house" of the EU. A strong EU means a strong Germany. Also, a lot of the loans that Greece took out came from French and German banks. So if Greece defaulted, then France and Germany would be the ones losing a lot of money. So in a way, these bailouts are as much for their own banks as they are for the Greek's.

    Now, as for trade, it would definitely be bad for the smaller countries to ruin the larger ones. But, a messy exit of small countries would be a lot worse. If they were to leave, it would signal to the rest of the world that the Euro was a failure. This would cause bankers to dump their holdings in European companies, and in the Euro itself, which would further deepen their recession. So even if these smaller countries are dragging the others down, the stronger states know that they must keep them afloat in order to keep their own economies stable.

    The EU is beneficial to them because it elevates all of their economies to rival those of the US and China. Because of our own economic woes, the Euro is starting to show up more and more in international trade. Take OPEC for example. They used to deal exclusively in dollars, but now they are mulling over the option to switch to the Euro. Without the EU, none of those countries on their own would have been able to get their own currency to that level.

    I hope that answers your questions, let me know if I missed anything.

    ReplyDelete